<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fancy Cinematic Footwork and Symbolistic Ambiguity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne Hedley</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Hedley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>You will have heard 'Man cannot live on Bread alone'  -  and our multi talented actor Hugh Jackman cannot live on 'Wolverine' alone.   He has much more talent and shows you many many many different characters and can create excelent accents also.   I love Wolverine as does Hugh himself but he knows as well as anyone that to type cast is to die.

Watch this actor he is damn good, he is handsome, charasmatic, fun loving and has a great personality that leaps off the screen and extremely popular with anyone he works with.

Forget Tom Cruise [now that is not hard nowerdays is it] Brad Pitt he turned The Fountain down and knowing a great deal more aboutthe film now he woudl not have been able to create three characters so very very different   -  you know it is called talent.    Brad is popular but has not that talent to that extent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will have heard &#8216;Man cannot live on Bread alone&#8217;  -  and our multi talented actor Hugh Jackman cannot live on &#8216;Wolverine&#8217; alone.   He has much more talent and shows you many many many different characters and can create excelent accents also.   I love Wolverine as does Hugh himself but he knows as well as anyone that to type cast is to die.</p>
<p>Watch this actor he is damn good, he is handsome, charasmatic, fun loving and has a great personality that leaps off the screen and extremely popular with anyone he works with.</p>
<p>Forget Tom Cruise [now that is not hard nowerdays is it] Brad Pitt he turned The Fountain down and knowing a great deal more aboutthe film now he woudl not have been able to create three characters so very very different   -  you know it is called talent.    Brad is popular but has not that talent to that extent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>I'm going on vacation at the end of the week, so I'm hoping to take in a few movies while I'm away -- definitely want to see The Prestige and The Fountain. Getting your hands on the Wii and PS3 seems impossible at this point. People are friggin' shooting each other over them!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going on vacation at the end of the week, so I&#8217;m hoping to take in a few movies while I&#8217;m away &#8212; definitely want to see The Prestige and The Fountain. Getting your hands on the Wii and PS3 seems impossible at this point. People are friggin&#8217; shooting each other over them!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massdistraction</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>massdistraction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>Joe - I wound up paying close attention to his head size during &lt;em&gt;The Fountain&lt;/em&gt;, and it did look unusually small.

Denise - I hope you guys got a Wii. We were unsuccessful.

Chel - it's definitely worth watching, and not so upsetting. Just a little...disorienting at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe - I wound up paying close attention to his head size during <em>The Fountain</em>, and it did look unusually small.</p>
<p>Denise - I hope you guys got a Wii. We were unsuccessful.</p>
<p>Chel - it&#8217;s definitely worth watching, and not so upsetting. Just a little&#8230;disorienting at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chel</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Chel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>I've been intrigued by the Fountain too...  I hear that the movie was done without CGI, like that's a real bubble he travels in.  But I'm a little scared to see it because I'm afraid the movie might be way more upsetting than the preview looks.  Is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been intrigued by the Fountain too&#8230;  I hear that the movie was done without CGI, like that&#8217;s a real bubble he travels in.  But I&#8217;m a little scared to see it because I&#8217;m afraid the movie might be way more upsetting than the preview looks.  Is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>My son has been saving for months in anticipation for the Wii.
We are excited! 
We are not buying a PS3. Doesn't seem like a good deal to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son has been saving for months in anticipation for the Wii.<br />
We are excited!<br />
We are not buying a PS3. Doesn&#8217;t seem like a good deal to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massdistraction.org/weblog/index.php/2006/11/16/fancy-cinematic-footwork-and-symbolistic-ambiguity/#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>The last time we went to NYC, we saw Hugh Jackman and his kid in The American Museum of Natural History.  My friend S commented that he had a freakishly small head .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time we went to NYC, we saw Hugh Jackman and his kid in The American Museum of Natural History.  My friend S commented that he had a freakishly small head .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
